The USGS Land Cover Institute (LCI)



|| Urban Dynamics |  Temporal Mapping |  Objectives |  Benefits |  Regional Assesments |  Papers/Abstracts |  Data/Images ||

Urban Dynamics: Methodology For Temporal Database Development

Patuxent River Watershed
Agricultural Land Use Change

Historical maps and records indicate that there are specific parameters guiding the selection of lands for agricultural use.

Of primary importance is the physical condition of the land. Areas of good soil quality are selected for development first, followed by areas of moderate, and then low, quality. Slope of the land is also an important condition. Low lying lands are ideal for cultivation, while areas of moderate to steep slopes tend to require more labor to work. Third, consideration must be given to the existing land use or land cover of the area. If an area of low slope and high quality soils is covered by trees or urban structures, a good deal more energy and effort must be put toward its conversion to farm land. Lands best suited for agriculture are those that are already cleared and do not have seasonal (wetlands) or permanent conditions that interfere with cultivation.

In seventeenth century Maryland, the first European settlers selected lands to farm that had previously been under cultivation by the native population. These cleared lands were typically in low lying tidewater areas with favorable soil conditions. As these lands were developed, agricultural land use followed the waterways in to the Piedmont area where good soils and low slopes prevailed.

As important as the condition of the land, it is also critical that lands developed for agriculture have appropriate access to transportation networks. Crops can be grown on a variety of land conditions, but if there is no way to transport the harvest to market, there is little agricultural value in the land. Prior to the mid-1800s farm lands were located along waterways where goods could be loaded on ships and exported for profit. After the 1850s, when railroad expansion created an alternative method for the shipment of agricultural products, interior land areas could be put under cultivation. The development of road networks in the interior allowed agricultural development to consume areas left vacant because of their distance from waterways or railroads.

The following table shows the time periods and corresponding data sets used to develop the temporal agricultural land use database.

Database Time Periods and Associated Data Sources

  Census of Agriculture National Resources Inventory Land Use/Land Cover Data Landsat
1850 1850      
1900 1900      
1950 1950      
1972 1974   GIRAS 1972 MSS 1972
1982 1982 1982 CCAP 1984 TM 1982
1987 1987 1987 CCAP 1988/89  
1992 1992 1992 MRLC 1993 TM 1992

The following graph illustrates the data sources available to determine agricultural land use in the seven counties of the Patuxent Basin. The graph highlights the differences between the land use acreages for each data set.

Agricultural

The type of source materials available determined the actual procedures that were used. A geographic information system (GIS) was used to assemble and integrate the data.

The following crosswalk provides an overview of the data sources and their classes that were considered in the development of the temporal agricultural database.

Classification System Crosswalk

  Census of Agriculture National Resources Inventory GIRAS CCAP MRLC
Agriculture Land in Farms Cropland - Cultivated Cropland and Pasture Cropland Pasture/Hay
Improved Land in Farms Cropland - Noncultivated Orchards, Groves, Vineyards, etc. Grassland Row Crops
Unimproved Land in Farms Pastureland Confined Feeding Operations
Other Agricultural Land
Forest (none) Forest Land Deciduous Forest Land Deciduous Forest Deciduous Forest
Evergreen Forest Land Evergreen Forest Evergreen Forest
Mixed Forest Land Mixed Forest Mixed Forest
Forested Wetland Mixed Shrub/Scrub Woody Wetland
Palustrine Forest
Urban (none) Urban/Built-up Land Residential Developed Low Intensity Low Intensity Residential
Commercial and Services Developed High Intensity High Intensity Residential
Industrial Commercial/ Industrial
Other Grasses
Water (none) Water - small stream Water Water Water
Water - census stream
Wetland (none) (none) Nonforested Wetland Estuarine Emergent Wetland Emergent Wetland
Palustrine Emergent Wetland
Other (none) Misc/Minor Land Cover/Use (none) (none) (none)
Rural Transportation
Federal Land
Rangeland (none) Rangeland Rangeland (none) (none)
Barren (none) (none) Barren Land Exposed Land Quarry/Strip Mine/Gravel Pit
Tidal Flats Bar/Rock/Sand
Transitional Barren


For more information on the specific methods used to determine land use for each of the data sets listed above, visit the following:





Accessibility FOIA Privacy Policies and Notices

Take Pride in America home page. USA.gov logo U.S. Department of the Interior | U.S. Geological Survey
URL: http://landcover.usgs.gov
Page Contact Information: LCI Administrator
Page Last Modified: March 2007